對(duì)稱塑料套管注塑模具設(shè)計(jì)

對(duì)稱塑料套管注塑模具設(shè)計(jì),對(duì)稱塑料套管注塑模具設(shè)計(jì),對(duì)稱,塑料,套管,注塑,模具設(shè)計(jì) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Y.-S. Ma T. Tong An object-oriented design tool for associative cooling channels in plastic-injection moulds Received: 17 December 2002/ Accepted: 17 December 2002/Published online: 17 October 2003 C211 Springer-Verlag London Limited 2003 Abstract Due to the demand for short product devel- opment cycles, plastic injection mould designers are re- quired to compress their design time and to accommodate more late changes. This paper describes an associative design approach embedded in a cooling channel module of a mould design software package. It gives a set of comprehensive object definitions for cooling circuits, and addresses balanced or unbalanced designs. CAD algorithms that have been developed are briefly explained. With this new approach, mould designers can easily propagate changes between mould plates or inserts and the cooling system without the need for tedious rework. Hence, this approach can signifi- cantly reduce the total design time and the impact of late changes. Keywords Cooling circuit Plastic mould design CAD/CAM Associative design Design automation 1 Introduction Currently, most CAD systems are unable to capture design intent completely and unambiguously. Rich de- sign information cannot be fully represented in CAD models and late changes in the product development cycle cause a lot of rework. It has been acknowledged that CAD interoperability should cover integration with knowledge-based engineering (KBE) systems 1. How- ever, there is no mechanism to enable design intent information flow. Such an information gap is very obvious in plastic injection mould design as well. Mould designers are facing increasing pressure to reduce the design time, and yet are expected to assure mould quality. Various CAD tools for designing plastic injection moulds have emerged since the early 1970s 2, most of which focused on moulding flow analysis and optimi- sation algorithms 3, 4, 5. Recently, the design of mould sub-systems, such as core/cavity inserts 6, 7, runners 8, 9, gate locations 3, 4, 5 and cooling systems 10, have been the focus. For cooling system design, Wang et al. 11 suggested a strategy with three stages, initial design with one-dimensional approximation, two-dimensional design with optimisation, and three-dimensional design with cooling eect analysis. They have developed a program that uses 3D-boundary element methods to analyse 3D heat transfer. All the above-mentioned tools are only able to generate geometrical information. The representation and reuse of rich design information at dierent levels are not addressed. Object-oriented (OO) software technology has been applied to meet the information representation gap in mould design 12. Object definitions can provide a great deal of help in sorting out complicated entities, espe- cially for part-independent parts and features. However, maintaining the relationships among geometrical entities and making them customisable is still not a trivial task. The CAD software development approach that can achieve persistent relationships among geometrical entities is referred to as the associative design approach. One way to build design intent and process knowledge into a CAD system is in the form of a process wizard, which is basically an application program coupled with a set of sequenced user interfaces (UIs) to guide users to complete certain interactions with the computer system. MouldWizard from EDS Inc. is one such process-based wizard 13. This paper introduces the associative design approach applied in its cooling channel module. Market feedback shows that this concept can significantly reduce the gap between human knowledge and consistent computer representations. The cooling system in a mould aects not only the quality of resultant moulding parts but also eciency in Y.-S. Ma ( design variables, such as locations, types of cooling channels, and 3D layout of circuits, are usually modified frequently to address late part design changes as well as mould design optimisation. The modification process is laborious and error prone because designers have to edit and update CAD models repetitively. Mok et al. 16 developed a cooling system that can automatically retrieve certain circuit patterns, such as straight or U types, but the association among geometrical entities is not discussed. An expert system for designing cooling systems was introduced by Kwon et al. 10. The system consists of four levels: layout design, analysis, evaluation and decision-making. A decision-making module evaluates the redesign of cooling channels based on the rules stored in a knowledge base. However, there is no inte- gration with a parametric CAD system. In summary, an ecient and user-friendly cooling system design tool is highly sought; such a system can be expected to free mould designers from tedious geomet- rical updating and to keep design models consistent, so that the total mould design cycle time can be shortened. This paper presents a cooling channel design tool that provides substantial automation for cooling circuit generation with associative links among cooling holes and their drilling faces. 1.1 Generic issues associated with capturing design intents In the industry, cooling channels are usually designed in the form of cooling circuit, but represented as HOLE features using CAD tools. On the other hand, experi- enced mould designers found that solid cylinders are also commonly used instead to represent cooling chan- nels. In the latter approach, when the design is finalised, all channels are united to form a cooling circuit. With such united circuits defined with the help of CAE anal- ysis tools, the cooling eect can be evaluated 11. These circuits are not converted into holes until the design has been finalised and is ready for CAM tool path genera- tion. With this form of representation, a CAD system can display/draw cooling channels for visual inspection, without displaying detailed features of the core/cavity inserts and mould plates. Repositioning and modifying cylinders also require fewer steps than using HOLE features. It enables automatic checking for collisions between cooling channels and other mould features, such as cavities and ejecting-pin holes. However, representing cooling channels in the form of solid cylinders has several problems. First, many steps are still required for a simple channel, such as creating a cylinder, chamfering the blind end in the case of a blind hole, and running through a series of dialogue boxes to position and orient it. Commonly, there are many channels in a cooling circuit, so creating them involves a lot of repetitive commands. When modifications are needed, cylinders have to be edited repetitively again. This situation is error-prone. Second, cooling channels are not self-identified. For automatic heat transfer analysis or collision checking, identifying cooling chan- nels is particularly important. Third, they cannot pro- vide orientation information for plugs, nozzles, or baes to be inserted into cooling channels in a user- friendly drag-and-drop manner. Hence, mould designers have been frustrated with tedious steps. 1.2 Semantic definitions of a cooling system An object-oriented software design approach can be applied to address the issues discussed in the above section. Defining a set of object types or classes that provides self-contained definitions of cooling systems and enables dynamic updating to validate the cooling system, is essential. In Fig. 1, the simplified semantic structure of a cooling system and its related component member types is shown. Each component type is defined as an object class. A cooling channel is defined as a continuous straight hole that contains cooling liquid (water in most cases). It can be contained in a single mould component (plates or inserts), or it cuts across several. In this paper, hole is used to describe the geometrical shape of a cooling channel on a single mould component, however, its representation is not the same as traditional HOLE features (see the next section). An example of a cooling circuit is shown in Fig. 2. Holes 15 are cooling chan- nels. A cooling circuit represents all the inter-connected cooling channels between an inlet and an outlet. Several cooling circuits form a cooling system. In Fig. 2, holes 15 jointly form a cooling circuit. A circuit can have several cooling channels with dierent orientations. These channels consist of cooling holes which are drilled from dierent faces of the mould plates or inserts. The face used to drill a cooling hole is called the penetrating face. Naturally, a cooling hole has one penetrating face and the hole-drilling vector always leaves from the pe- netrating face and points to the other end. Usually, Fig. 1 Semantic structure of a cooling system 80 cooling holes are perpendicular to the penetrating face. However, in order to cater to some special cases, this constraint is not imposed for the purposes of this article. In practice, some cooling channels cut across multiple blocks; an example of this is shown in Fig. 3. It consists of several connected collinear cooling holes (hole 1, hole 2 and hole 3). Such channels are specially named col- linear cooling channels. In many cases, multi-impression design is used for the mould layout. There are two approaches to creat- ing cooling circuits then: balanced and unbalanced. A cooling system is referred to as balanced if the same cooling circuit pattern is applied to every impression. Otherwise, the cooling system is unbalanced. Usually, if the mould is designed with a balanced multi-impression pattern 14, and the designer wishes to have an identical cooling circuit for each impression section, then the balanced approach is used. In this case, because each circuit is designed mainly to cover one impression; the cooling eect can be better controlled to satisfy heat- transfer requirements. This is especially recommended for complex moulding parts where the cooling eect can be optimised using simulation packages 11. With this approach, a CAD function that is commonly required by mould designers is to reflect the changes in the cooling circuit pattern on the individual impressions. On the other hand, the designer may want to treat the mould as a whole and design cooling circuits without considering the impression pattern; if this is the case he can apply the unbalanced approach. 1.3 Detailed representations A detailed component structure of a cooling system is given in Fig. 4. A hole is represented with a straight line and an optional cylindrical solid. This straight line is called the cooling guideline for the hole. More precisely, a cooling guideline is a straight-line segment starting from the cooling-hole penetrating centre point to the holes end centre point. In Fig. 2, AB is the cool guideline for hole 1, and CD is for hole 2. Guidelines contain hole-drilling vectors. At both the start and end points of each cooling hole, the following types of hole-ends can be selected, as shown in Fig. 5: (1) Drill-through, (2) Counter-bored, (3) Blind without extension and (4) Blind with extension. Such geometrical feature information is represented as Fig. 3 A typical collinear cooling channel Fig. 4 Detailed component structures of a cooling system Fig. 2 An example of cooling circuit 81 attributes attached to guidelines. The cylindrical solids can be generated anytime if it is needed based on the information stored with each guideline. Traditionally, cooling lines are also used to represent a cooling circuit 11, but they are separate entities from the containing solids, such as mould plates or inserts. One of the design ideas in this paper is that every guideline has start and end point that are associated with the corresponding penetrating and exiting faces, except for the end points of blind holes. Therefore, if these faces change their positions, the associated points can be de- rived dynamically and updated accordingly. In other words, cooling guidelines are always associated with their penetrating and exiting faces. The cooling guidelines of all the holes within a cooling circuit are grouped as a guide path. In Fig. 2, five guidelines, AB, CD, EF, GH, and IJ, form a guide path. In this paper, as shown in Fig. 4, a guide path represents each cooling circuit completely while cooling guidelines can have certain attributes to describe the cooling-hole types, diameters, etc. In fact, cooling cylindrical solids are generated only when needed for viewing, checking physical collision among dierent features/components, or creating de- tailed features on plates or inserts. These cooling solids can be deleted to simplify the display; as long as the guide paths are available, these cooling solids can be regenerated. At later stages, after confirming the cooling system design, geometrical holes may be still needed for CAM application or component structure detailing. They can be achieved by subtracting cooling solids from their corresponding plate/insert bodies. A guide path is also used to maintain connectivity among its guidelines. To validate and verify this condi- tion, a validator method is defined in the guide path class. The collinear cooling channel is the special object type that is created. From Fig. 4, it can be seen that a cooling circuit may contain such collinear cooling channels as well as simple channels. Each collinear channel can be represented by a group of guidelines called the collinear path. Obviously, its element guide- lines must be connected from head to tail continuously along a straight line. In Fig. 3, AB, CD and EF form a collinear path and represent through hole 1 (with both counter-bored ends), through hole 2, and blind hole 3 respectively. It can be seen that within a cooling circuit, cooling elements are associated because they are vali- dated instantly upon any change. As shown in Fig. 4, the contents and representation of a circuit object change according to the context and users choices, for example, a circuit can be displayed graphically as a set of inter-connected guidelines, or as a set of cylindrical solids. A cooling circuit is self-con- tained with geometrical and non-geometrical informa- tion in the form of rich attributes. In summary, with this object structure design, cooling channels and their related mould plates or inserts can be automatically updated if some elements, such as pene- trating faces or drilling-hole types are modified at later design stages. Since all the cooling channels are created in an associative approach, then the process knowledge, such as penetrating faces, drilling directions and conti- nuity within a circuit can be embedded within the CAD model and stored persistently. 2 Implementation aspects 2.1 Embedded links and parameters In a cooling design session with this module, guidelines are initially created through a graphical user interface. To associate the start and end points of every guideline with the penetrating and exiting faces, with the exception of the end points of blind holes, a smart point concept is used 13. A smart point is a point on the surface associated with the face at the kernel database level. It keeps the persistent link with the corresponding face. Here, word smart represents the associative nature of an entity to another related entity. Since guidelines are created based on such smart end points, then the cor- responding guidelines are also called smart lines. Each of them is connected to one (for blind holes) or two smart points (for through holes). A cooling solid cylinder can be generated automati- cally along its smart guideline by sweeping a circular section profile 13. For a blind hole, a cone end is added. For a cooling circuit, its cylindrical solids are then uni- ted as the solid representation. These geometrical fea- tures are represented with attributes attached to guidelines. Such related attributes include type of end (see Fig. 5), cooling hole diameter, and depth and diameter of the counter-bored portion, if applicable. They are used for cooling hole editing and cooling solid regeneration. 2.2 Functions and algorithms The main functions that have been developed in this module to meet the requirements for cooling system design are listed here: Fig. 5 Types of cooling cylinder ends 82 a. Addition of smart guidelines to form guide paths b. Modification/repositioning of guidelines c. Deleting of circuit guide paths d. Creation of cooling solids e. Modification of the cooling solids f. Deletion of the cooling solids g. Creation of balanced or unbalanced cooling designs for a multi-impression mould. These functions are briefly described below. 2.3 Creating and editing the smart guide path of a cooling circuit To create the first guideline of a guide path, the user needs to select a face on an intended solid as the inlet penetrating (planar) face of the circuit (see Fig. 2). A plane equation can be extracted from the selected planar face. The initial start point A for the guide path on this face can be found based on the users indication point; a smart point is then created. The default direction to generate the first cooling guideline is set to the reverse direction of the face to normal, and it is displayed on the graphic window. The user can interactively modify the initial point position and guideline direction with dif- ferent submenus activated from the UI shown in Fig. 6. Then, the user can dynamically drag a cooling line or input a value of the length for the guideline of a blind hole, or choose another face to indicate the ending face for a throughhole. In the latter case, another smart point will be created at the end point of the guideline. After creating the first guideline, a sequence number, 1, is displayed near it. To create the next guideline (see Fig. 2), a drilling vector is required. The user can indicate the bottom penetrating face at point P. Then, the next guideline direction is set to be in the reverse normal direction of the selected face. The vectors start point C is determined with reference to the previous guideline AB and the nearest point to the users indicated point P. This is an embedded rule implemented in this work. To make the vector definition user-friendlier, many such context rules are applied to assist guideline creation. In this case, when defining the guideline CD, from the previous AB, it is extended automatically to find the drilling point C on the bottom face. A smart point is created at C on this face to associate the guideline. Again, sequence number 2 is displayed near the guideline. The user can also define the next guideline vector by selecting one working coordinate direction, +X, )X, +Y, )Y, +Z, or )Z, and then indicate a guideline start point. In the similar manner, a complete guide path can be defined. Upon confirming all the guidelines of the intended guide path, the continuity within the path is checked with the validator method (see Fig. 4). This guide path is then treated as a single entity. As expected, guidelines can be created or added to a guide path by CAD functions. Existing guidelines can also be removed easily. During the interactions to define guidelines, the users input parameters and sequences are dierentiated with the corresponding algorithm branches. For example, to create a simple blind hole, the users selection sequences can be any of these three options: (a) just the penetrating face, (b) the penetrating face and then an existing per- pendicular reference cooling hole, and (c) simply an existing cooling hole collinear to the intended one. Un- der each option, the users selection sequences are dis- tinguished; necessary adjustments to the intended cooling line are made to keep the guide path connected, and a friendly UI is designed. After a cooling guideline is selected, its properties, including its length, are displayed on the same UI as shown in Fig. 6. These can be changed and updated. In fact, when