喜歡這套資料就充值下載吧。。。資源目錄里展示的都可在線預(yù)覽哦。。。下載后都有，，請放心下載，，文件全都包含在內(nèi)，，【有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605 或 1304139763】
========================================喜歡這套資料就充值下載吧。。。資源目錄里展示的都可在線預(yù)覽哦。。。下載后都有，，請放心下載，，文件全都包含在內(nèi)，，【有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605 或 1304139763】
========================================
河北建筑工程學(xué)院
畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）開題報(bào)告
課題
名稱
ZL50裝載機(jī)總體及變速箱設(shè)計(jì)（第二行星排）
系 別： 機(jī)械工程系
專 業(yè)： 機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)制造及其自動化
班 級： 機(jī)094
學(xué)生姓名： 張 維
學(xué) 號： 2009307405
指導(dǎo)教師： 王少雷
課題來源
導(dǎo)師課題
課題類別
工程設(shè)計(jì)
一、論文資料的準(zhǔn)備
裝載機(jī)是一種用途非常廣泛得工程機(jī)械，它廣泛應(yīng)用于鏟裝、搬運(yùn)、卸載、平整散裝物料，也可以對巖石硬土等進(jìn)行輕度得鏟掘工作。因此，它被廣泛應(yīng)用于建筑、公路、鐵路、水電、港口、礦山及國防等工程中。裝載機(jī)對加快工程建設(shè)速度、減輕勞動強(qiáng)度、提高工程質(zhì)量、降低工程成本具有重要作用。所以裝載機(jī)在國內(nèi)外不論是品種還是產(chǎn)量，都有飛速發(fā)展，并且成為工程機(jī)械的主要品種之一。
我國的輪式裝載機(jī)是從20世紀(jì)70年代初期發(fā)展起來的，與其他機(jī)種工程機(jī)械相比，輪式裝載機(jī)的橋、箱、泵、閥及缸等零部件產(chǎn)品配套相對成熟，已經(jīng)形成了比較完整的配套體系。而且自90年代以來，國內(nèi)外工程機(jī)械進(jìn)入了一個(gè)新的發(fā)展時(shí)期。工程機(jī)械產(chǎn)品以信息技術(shù)為先導(dǎo)，在發(fā)動機(jī)燃料燃燒與電控、液壓控制系統(tǒng)、自動操縱、可視化駕駛、精確定位與作業(yè)、故障診斷與監(jiān)控、節(jié)能與環(huán)保等方面，有了長足的進(jìn)步。設(shè)計(jì)人員開發(fā)出了許多新結(jié)構(gòu)和新產(chǎn)品。ZL50型裝載機(jī)作為主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)品，經(jīng)過多年的發(fā)展，質(zhì)量水平得到不斷提高，已經(jīng)形成獨(dú)立的產(chǎn)品系列和行業(yè)門類。近年來，國內(nèi)外裝載機(jī)的發(fā)展趨向于采用新結(jié)構(gòu)新技術(shù)，并向機(jī)電一體化、電子化方向發(fā)展。
然而，我國裝載機(jī)在設(shè)計(jì)上存在很多問題，主要集中在可靠性、結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)強(qiáng)度等方面。而變速箱對于裝載機(jī)來說又是重中之重，所以變速箱的設(shè)計(jì)好壞直接影響到裝載機(jī)的使用壽命以及工作效率。雖然現(xiàn)在市場上的裝載機(jī)已經(jīng)日趨成熟，但對其進(jìn)行改進(jìn)設(shè)計(jì)，尤其是對裝載機(jī)的變速箱進(jìn)行改進(jìn)設(shè)計(jì)，仍有非常重要的意義。
ZL50裝載機(jī)所采用的是行星式動力換擋變速箱：
首先，星行變速箱的主要優(yōu)點(diǎn)是，可通過在行星排中設(shè)計(jì)多個(gè)行星輪，使載荷由幾對齒共同傳遞，減輕了每對齒上的載荷，以便選用較小的模數(shù)，從而減小齒輪體積，因此行星變速箱在徑向方向尺寸較緊湊。但軸向尺寸則與所采用的行星排數(shù)目有關(guān)，當(dāng)行星排數(shù)較多時(shí)，則軸向尺寸較大。另外還可實(shí)現(xiàn)輸入與輸出軸同心轉(zhuǎn)動。
其中簡單行星排是由太陽輪、齒圈、行星架和行星輪組成。由于行星輪軸向旋轉(zhuǎn)與外界連接困難，故在行星排中只有太陽輪、齒圈和行星架三個(gè)元件能與外界相連，并稱為基本元件。在行星排傳遞運(yùn)動過程中，行星輪只起到傳遞運(yùn)動的惰輪作用，與傳動比無直接關(guān)系。其中三個(gè)基本元件的傳遞中僅有兩個(gè)是獨(dú)立參數(shù)，這表示行星排具有兩個(gè)自由度。當(dāng)以某種方式固定某一個(gè)元件后，行星排變成了一自由度系統(tǒng)，即可由轉(zhuǎn)速方程式確定另外兩元件的轉(zhuǎn)速比。這樣，通過將行星排三個(gè)基本元件分別作為固定件、主動件或從動件，則可組成六種方案。
由于zl50裝載機(jī)采用雙渦輪變矩器和機(jī)械自動變速裝置相結(jié)合，可以得到較大的變矩系數(shù)，且高效率范圍寬，其作用相當(dāng)于變矩器加上一個(gè)二檔自動變速箱（隨外負(fù)荷變化，不需人操縱，自動換擋）。因此他后面的行星變速箱檔位數(shù)可以減少，ZL50型裝載機(jī)的行星變速箱，有兩個(gè)行星排組成，只有兩個(gè)前進(jìn)擋和一個(gè)倒檔。輸入軸和輸入齒輪做成一體，與二級渦輪輸出齒輪常嚙合，二檔輸入軸與二檔制動器摩擦片連成一體。前后行星排的太陽輪、行星輪、齒圈的齒數(shù)相同。兩行星排的太陽輪制成一體，通過花鍵與輸入軸、二檔輸入軸相連。前行星排齒圈與后行星排星架、二檔離合器受壓盤三者通過花鍵連成一體。前行星排行星架和后行星排齒圈分別設(shè)有倒檔、一檔制動器摩擦片。
變速箱后部是一個(gè)分動箱，輸出齒輪用螺栓和二檔油缸、二檔離合器受壓盤連成一體，同變速箱輸出齒輪組成常嚙齒輪副，后者用花鍵和前橋輸出軸連接。后橋輸出軸前端用滑動軸承支撐在前橋輸出軸后面中心孔內(nèi)；后端則以滾動軸承支撐在殼體上。前、后橋離合套用花鍵和前、后橋輸出軸相連，并可由撥叉波動，當(dāng)離合套移向前面時(shí)，前后輪同時(shí)驅(qū)動；當(dāng)離合套移向后面時(shí)，則只有前橋驅(qū)動。離合套通過拉桿、撥叉來操縱，并有鎖定機(jī)構(gòu)。
相比液力機(jī)械傳動系統(tǒng)的裝載機(jī)不能拖啟動；當(dāng)柴油機(jī)熄火后，便不能轉(zhuǎn)向；不能利用柴油機(jī)進(jìn)行排氣制動。ZL50裝載機(jī)的傳動系統(tǒng)中設(shè)有“三合一”機(jī)構(gòu)，可以解決這些問題。
此構(gòu)件由以下零件組成，空轉(zhuǎn)齒輪通過一個(gè)滾動軸承支撐在閉鎖離合器被動鼓軸上，滑動嚙合套與閉鎖離合器被動鼓周通過花鍵連接。中間傳動軸，其上固定著齒輪1，此齒輪與另一齒輪2嚙合，齒輪3通過滾珠軸承和自由輪支撐在中間傳動軸上。齒輪3與油泵齒輪相嚙合，而油泵齒輪變矩器泵輪齒圈相嚙合。
當(dāng)發(fā)動機(jī)啟動后，發(fā)動機(jī)由被動變?yōu)橹鲃樱催^來通過這條傳動路線來驅(qū)動車輪。由于自由輪只能單向傳動，反向傳動時(shí)，它自動把動力切斷，這樣，防止有可能發(fā)動機(jī)通過兩條傳動路線來驅(qū)動車輪，發(fā)生干涉，使“三合一”機(jī)構(gòu)受損。三合一機(jī)構(gòu)存有一個(gè)缺點(diǎn)，當(dāng)發(fā)動機(jī)突然熄火時(shí)，要想利用發(fā)動機(jī)制動和保持動力轉(zhuǎn)向，需將嚙合套迅速連接上，但往往難于結(jié)合上。
基于上述內(nèi)容，此設(shè)計(jì)主要是改進(jìn)變速箱，設(shè)計(jì)過程：變速箱行星機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行運(yùn)動學(xué)和動力學(xué)分析，行星變速箱傳動方案簡圖設(shè)計(jì)，齒輪傳動部分設(shè)計(jì)，換擋制動器和閉鎖離合器設(shè)計(jì)，行星變速箱結(jié)構(gòu)分析。跟緊裝載機(jī)行業(yè)向高檔、高技術(shù)含量和智能化方向發(fā)展的趨勢，開發(fā)和生產(chǎn)具有自主知識產(chǎn)權(quán)、適合我國國情的重型車用變速器。
二、本課題的目的（重點(diǎn)及擬解決的關(guān)鍵問題）
輪式裝載機(jī)總體設(shè)計(jì)，是機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)制造及其自動化專業(yè)學(xué)習(xí)的一個(gè)重要的環(huán)節(jié)。通過設(shè)計(jì)提高我們對機(jī)構(gòu)的分析能力，機(jī)械構(gòu)造設(shè)計(jì)的能力，機(jī)電一體化系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)能力，掌握實(shí)踐生產(chǎn)過程自動化的設(shè)計(jì)方法，并鍛煉機(jī)械類學(xué)生的綜合素質(zhì)。通過設(shè)計(jì)，我們將有關(guān)課程（如機(jī)械原理，機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)，理論力學(xué)，材料力學(xué)，液壓與氣壓傳動，工程材料，材料成型，自動控制理論，電氣控制，測試技術(shù)，數(shù)控技術(shù)，微型計(jì)算機(jī)原理及應(yīng)用等）中所獲得的理論知識在實(shí)際中綜合地加以運(yùn)用，并使這些知識得到鞏固和發(fā)展，并使理論知識和生產(chǎn)密切的結(jié)合起來。
關(guān)鍵問題：了解裝載機(jī)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和結(jié)構(gòu)類型，確定裝載機(jī)總體參數(shù)、總體布置；分析行星機(jī)構(gòu)的運(yùn)動學(xué)和動力學(xué)，其中包括運(yùn)動分析、力矩分析、功率分析；分析行星齒輪變速箱，其包括行星變速箱組成、自由度和檔位數(shù)分析，行星變速箱轉(zhuǎn)速分析，行星變速箱力矩分析；設(shè)計(jì)行星變速箱傳動方案簡圖；設(shè)計(jì)齒輪傳動部分，包括基本參數(shù)的確定、配齒計(jì)算、齒輪的幾何計(jì)算；分析行星變速箱結(jié)構(gòu)，包括行星變速箱中不轉(zhuǎn)動部分的支撐和定位、旋轉(zhuǎn)零件的支撐和定位。編寫符合要求的設(shè)計(jì)說明書，并正確繪制機(jī)械與液壓工程圖紙，獨(dú)立撰寫一分畢業(yè)論文，并繪制有關(guān)圖表。
三、主要內(nèi)容、研究方法、研究思路
（1） 設(shè)計(jì)任務(wù)：
① 裝載機(jī)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r和結(jié)構(gòu)類別
② 裝載機(jī)總體參數(shù)的確定
③ 裝載機(jī)的總體布置
④ 裝載機(jī)變速箱傳動特性分析
（2） 裝載機(jī)變速箱的設(shè)計(jì)和計(jì)算
① 變速箱結(jié)構(gòu)形式的選擇
② 變速箱行星排運(yùn)動和受力分析
③ 行星變速箱傳動方案簡圖設(shè)計(jì)
通過對資料的調(diào)查、收集、加工與整理，綜合運(yùn)用多學(xué)科的理論、知識與技能，分析解決變速箱設(shè)計(jì)中的問題。并且經(jīng)過實(shí)習(xí)，了解變速箱的實(shí)際工作狀況，在對變速箱設(shè)計(jì)過程中有所幫助外，還能使自己的設(shè)計(jì)更加接近實(shí)際。
四、總體安排和進(jìn)度（包括階段性工作內(nèi)容及完成日期）
2013.3.29-2013.4.11 熟悉整理資料
2013.4.12-2013.4.25 方案選擇及總體設(shè)計(jì)
2013.4.26-2013.5.9 繪制總圖
2013.5.10-2013.5.23 變速箱傳統(tǒng)系統(tǒng)分析
2013.5.24-2013.6.13 行星排設(shè)計(jì)及受力分析計(jì)算
2013.6.14-2013.6.22 繪制零件圖紙
2013.6.23-2013.6.27 準(zhǔn)備論文及答辯
五、主要參考文獻(xiàn)
[1]吳永平等.工程機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)機(jī) 北京 化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社 2007.
[2]楊占敏 輪式裝載機(jī) 北京 化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社,2007.
[3]吳慶鳴 何小新 工程機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì) 武漢 武漢大學(xué)出版社 2006.
[4]楊國平 現(xiàn)代工程機(jī)械技術(shù) 北京 機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社 2006.
[5]楊晉升 輪式裝載機(jī)設(shè)計(jì) 北京 機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社 1986
[6]張光裕 工程機(jī)械底盤構(gòu)造與設(shè)計(jì) 1986
[7]同濟(jì)大學(xué)主編 鏟土運(yùn)輸機(jī)械 北京 中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1987.
[8]吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)編. 輪式裝載機(jī)設(shè)計(jì) 北京 中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1989.
[9]同濟(jì)大學(xué)主編. 工程機(jī)械底盤構(gòu)造與設(shè)計(jì) 北京 中國建筑工業(yè)出版社，1987.
[10]諸文農(nóng)編. 底盤設(shè)計(jì)（上、下） 北京 機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社.
[11]許鎮(zhèn)宇、邱宣懷主編. 機(jī)械零件 北京 人民教育出版社.
[12]機(jī)械零件課程設(shè)計(jì).貴州：貴州人民出版社.
[13]吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)主編. 工程機(jī)械液壓與液力傳動 北京 機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社.
[14]東北工學(xué)院編.機(jī)械零件設(shè)計(jì)手冊. 北京：冶金工業(yè)出版社.
[15]成大先主編 機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)手冊 北京 化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社，2004.
[16]《機(jī)械工程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)手冊》編委會編 機(jī)械工程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)手冊 北京 中國標(biāo)準(zhǔn)出版社，2002.
[17]黃宗益、薛瑞祺、閻以誦編著 工程機(jī)械CAD 上海 同濟(jì)大學(xué)出版設(shè)，1990.
[18] 聞邦椿.機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)手冊（第五版）北京 機(jī)械工業(yè)出版社，2010.
指導(dǎo)教師意見：
指導(dǎo)教師簽名： 日期：
教研室意見：
教研室主任簽名： 日期：
系意見：
系領(lǐng)導(dǎo)簽名： 日期：
系蓋章
課題來源：導(dǎo)師課題、社會實(shí)踐、自選、其他
課題類別：工程設(shè)計(jì)、施工技術(shù)、新品開發(fā)、軟件開發(fā)、科學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)、畢業(yè)論文。
河北建筑工程學(xué)院
畢業(yè)實(shí)習(xí)報(bào)告
系 別 機(jī)械工程系
專 業(yè) 機(jī)械設(shè)計(jì)制造及其自動化
班 級 機(jī)094班
姓 名 張 維
學(xué) 號 2009407405
指導(dǎo)教師 王少雷
實(shí)習(xí)成績
畢業(yè)實(shí)習(xí)報(bào)告
1.實(shí)習(xí)目的
通過參觀數(shù)控機(jī)床及其操作，將所學(xué)專業(yè)知識與實(shí)踐相結(jié)合，并根據(jù)實(shí)習(xí)內(nèi)容不斷總結(jié)來豐富自己的經(jīng)驗(yàn)；不斷培養(yǎng)獨(dú)立思考問題、解決問題、自學(xué)能力以及在工作中團(tuán)隊(duì)協(xié)作的精神，最終將自己的所學(xué)運(yùn)用于這次畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)中，設(shè)計(jì)出符合要求畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)成果，并通過這次實(shí)踐來檢驗(yàn)所學(xué)的理論知識。
2.實(shí)習(xí)內(nèi)容
本次實(shí)習(xí)的地點(diǎn):天津大學(xué)；時(shí)間：2013年4月2 日；內(nèi)容：本次實(shí)習(xí)的主要內(nèi)容是對數(shù)控機(jī)床有一個(gè)總體的了解，并對本次所要設(shè)計(jì)的相關(guān)數(shù)控編程和加工程序有一個(gè)詳細(xì)的了解。本次實(shí)習(xí)所要解決的主要問題包括：數(shù)控機(jī)床的工作原理和其先進(jìn)性、設(shè)計(jì)加工零件程序和相關(guān)編程。
3.實(shí)習(xí)結(jié)果
在老師的講解下，我們對五軸聯(lián)動數(shù)控機(jī)床了解的最多，五軸聯(lián)動數(shù)控機(jī)床是一種科技含量高、精密度高專門用于加工復(fù)雜曲面的機(jī)床，這種機(jī)床系統(tǒng)對一個(gè)國家的航空、航天、軍事、科研、精密器械、高精醫(yī)療設(shè)備等等行業(yè)有著舉足輕重的影響力。 目前，五軸聯(lián)動數(shù)控機(jī)床系統(tǒng)是解決葉輪、葉片、船用螺旋槳、重型發(fā)電機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)子、汽輪機(jī)轉(zhuǎn)子、大型柴油機(jī)曲軸等等加工的唯一手段。
五軸聯(lián)動機(jī)床的使用，讓工件的裝夾變得容易。加工時(shí)無需特殊夾具，降低了夾具的成本，避免了多次裝夾，提高模具加工精度。采用五軸技術(shù)加工 模具可以減少夾具的使用數(shù)量。另外，由于五軸聯(lián)動機(jī)床可在加工中省去許多特殊刀具，所以降低了刀具成本。五軸聯(lián)動機(jī)床在加工中能增加刀具的有效切削刃長 度，減小切削力，提高刀具使用壽命，降低成本。采用五軸聯(lián)動機(jī)床加工模具可以很快的完成模具加工，交貨快，更好的保證模具的加工質(zhì)量，使模具加工變得更加 容易，并且使模具修改變得容易。在傳統(tǒng)的模具加工中，一般用立式加工中心來完成工件的銑削加工。隨著模具制造技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展，立式加工中心本身的一些弱點(diǎn) 表現(xiàn)得越來越明顯?，F(xiàn)代模具加工普遍使用球頭銑刀來加工，球頭銑刀在模具加工中帶來好處非常明顯，但是如果用立式加工中心的話，其底面的線速度為零，這樣 底面的光潔度就很差，如果使用四、五軸聯(lián)動機(jī)床加工技術(shù)加工模具，可以克服上述不足。
五軸聯(lián)動加工中心有高效率、高精度的特點(diǎn)，工件一次裝夾就可完成五面體的加工。若配以五軸聯(lián)動的高檔數(shù)控系統(tǒng)，還可以對復(fù)雜的空間曲面進(jìn)行高精度加工，更能夠適應(yīng)像汽車零部件、飛機(jī)結(jié)構(gòu)件等現(xiàn)代模具的加工。立式五軸加工中心的回轉(zhuǎn)軸有兩種方式，一種是工作臺回轉(zhuǎn)軸，設(shè)置在床身上的工作臺可以環(huán)繞X軸回轉(zhuǎn)，定義為A軸，A軸一般工作范圍+30度至-120度。工作臺的中間還設(shè)有一個(gè)回轉(zhuǎn)臺，在圖示的位置上環(huán)繞Z軸回轉(zhuǎn)，定義為C軸，C軸都是360度回轉(zhuǎn)。這樣通過A軸與C軸的組合，固定在工作臺上的工件除了底面之外，其余的五個(gè)面都可以由立式主軸進(jìn)行加工。A軸和C軸最小分度值一般為0.001度，這樣又可以把工件細(xì)分成任意角度，加工出傾斜面、傾斜孔等。A軸和C軸如與XYZ三直線軸實(shí)現(xiàn)聯(lián)動，就可加工出復(fù)雜的空間曲面，當(dāng)然這需要高檔的數(shù)控系統(tǒng)、伺服系統(tǒng)以及軟件的支持。這種設(shè)置方式的優(yōu)點(diǎn)是主軸的結(jié)構(gòu)比較簡單，主軸剛性非常好，制造成本比較低。但一般工作臺不能設(shè)計(jì)太大，承重也較小，特別是當(dāng)A軸回轉(zhuǎn)大于等于90度時(shí)，工件切削時(shí)會對工作臺帶來很大的承載力矩。 另一種是依靠立式主軸頭的回轉(zhuǎn)。主軸前端是一個(gè)回轉(zhuǎn)頭，能自行環(huán)繞Z軸360度，成為C軸，回轉(zhuǎn)頭上還有帶可環(huán)繞X軸旋轉(zhuǎn)的A軸，一般可達(dá)±90度以上，實(shí)現(xiàn)上述同樣的功能。這種設(shè)置方式的優(yōu)點(diǎn)是主軸加工非常靈活，工作臺也可以設(shè)計(jì)的非常大，客機(jī)龐大的機(jī)身、巨大的發(fā)動機(jī)殼都可以在這類加工中心上加工。這種設(shè)計(jì)還有一大優(yōu)點(diǎn)：我們在使用球面銑刀加工曲面時(shí)，當(dāng)?shù)毒咧行木€垂直于加工面時(shí)，由于球面銑刀的頂點(diǎn)線速度為零，頂點(diǎn)切出的工件表面質(zhì)量會很差，采用主軸回轉(zhuǎn)的設(shè)計(jì)，令主軸相對工件轉(zhuǎn)過一個(gè)角度，使球面銑刀避開頂點(diǎn)切削，保證有一定的線速度，可提高表面加工質(zhì)量。這種結(jié)構(gòu)非常受模具高精度曲面加工的歡迎，這是工作臺回轉(zhuǎn)式加工中心難以做到的。為了達(dá)到回轉(zhuǎn)的高精度，高檔的回轉(zhuǎn)軸還配置了圓光柵尺反饋，分度精度都在幾秒以內(nèi)，當(dāng)然這類主軸的回轉(zhuǎn)結(jié)構(gòu)比較復(fù)雜，制造成本也較高。
此外，我們還了解到數(shù)控機(jī)床許多優(yōu)點(diǎn)，在將來機(jī)械發(fā)展領(lǐng)域內(nèi)，數(shù)控將是重中之重。
與普通機(jī)床相比，數(shù)控機(jī)床有如下特點(diǎn)：
1、對加工對象的適應(yīng)性強(qiáng)，適應(yīng)模具等產(chǎn)品單件生產(chǎn)的特點(diǎn)，為模具的制造提供了合適的加工方法；
2、加工精度高，具有穩(wěn)定的加工質(zhì)量；
3、可進(jìn)行多坐標(biāo)的聯(lián)動，能加工形狀復(fù)雜的零件；
4、加工零件改變時(shí)，一般只需要更改數(shù)控程序，可節(jié)省生產(chǎn)準(zhǔn)備時(shí)間；
5、機(jī)床本身的精度高、剛性大，可選擇有利的加工用量，生產(chǎn)率高（一般為普通機(jī)床的3~5倍）；
6、機(jī)床自動化程度高，可以減輕勞動強(qiáng)度；
7、有利于生產(chǎn)管理的現(xiàn)代化。數(shù)控機(jī)床使用數(shù)字信息與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)代碼處理、傳遞信息，使用了計(jì)算機(jī)控制方法，為計(jì)算機(jī)輔助設(shè)計(jì)、制造及管理一體化奠定了基礎(chǔ)；
8、對操作人員的素質(zhì)要求較高，對維修人員的技術(shù)要求更高；
9、可靠性高。
與傳統(tǒng)機(jī)床相比，數(shù)控具有以下一些特點(diǎn)。
1、具有高度柔性
在數(shù)控機(jī)床上加工零件，主要取決于加工程序，它與普通機(jī)床不同，不必制造，更換許多模具、夾具，不需要經(jīng)常重新調(diào)整機(jī)床。因此，數(shù)控機(jī)床適用于所加工的零件頻繁更換的場合，亦即適合單件，小批量產(chǎn)品的生產(chǎn)及新產(chǎn)品的開發(fā)，從而縮短了生產(chǎn)準(zhǔn)備周期，節(jié)省了大量工藝裝備的費(fèi)用。
2、加工精度高
數(shù)控機(jī)床的加工精度一般可達(dá)0.05—0.1MM，數(shù)控機(jī)床是按數(shù)字信號形式控制的，數(shù)控裝置每輸出一脈沖信號，則機(jī)床移動部件移動一具脈沖當(dāng)量（一般為0.001MM），而且機(jī)床進(jìn)給傳動鏈的反向間隙與絲桿螺距平均誤差可由數(shù)控裝置進(jìn)行曲補(bǔ)償，因此，數(shù)控機(jī)床定位精度比較高。
3、加工質(zhì)量穩(wěn)定、可靠
加工同一批零件，在同一機(jī)床，在相同加工條件下，使用相同刀具和加工程序，刀具的走刀軌跡完全相同，零件的一致性好，質(zhì)量穩(wěn)定。
4、生產(chǎn)率高
數(shù)控機(jī)床可有效地減少零件的加工時(shí)間和輔助時(shí)間，數(shù)控機(jī)床的主軸聲速
和進(jìn)給量的范圍大，允許機(jī)床進(jìn)行大切削量的強(qiáng)力切削。數(shù)控機(jī)床正進(jìn)入高速加工時(shí)代，數(shù)控機(jī)床移動部件的快速移動和定位及高速切削加工，極大地提高了生產(chǎn)率。另外，與加工中心的刀庫配合使用，可實(shí)現(xiàn)在一臺機(jī)床上進(jìn)行多道工序的連續(xù)加工，減少了半成品的工序間周轉(zhuǎn)時(shí)間，提高了生產(chǎn)率。
5、改善勞動條件
數(shù)控機(jī)床加工前是經(jīng)調(diào)整好后，輸入程序并啟動，機(jī)床就能有自動連續(xù)地進(jìn)行加工，直至加工結(jié)束。操作者要做的只是程序的輸入、編輯、零件裝卸、刀具準(zhǔn)備、加工狀態(tài)的觀測、零件的檢驗(yàn)等工作，勞動強(qiáng)度大降低，機(jī)床操作者的勞動趨于智力型工作。另外，機(jī)床一般是結(jié)合起來，既清潔，又安全。
6、利用生產(chǎn)管理現(xiàn)代化
數(shù)控機(jī)床的加工，可預(yù)先精確估計(jì)加工時(shí)間，對所使用的刀具、夾具可進(jìn)行規(guī)范化，現(xiàn)代化管理，易于實(shí)現(xiàn)加工信息的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化，已與計(jì)算機(jī)輔助設(shè)計(jì)與制造（CAD/CAM）有機(jī)地結(jié)合起來，是現(xiàn)代化集成制造技術(shù)的基礎(chǔ)。
4.實(shí)習(xí)總結(jié)
此次實(shí)習(xí)，我不僅學(xué)到了很多數(shù)控方面的知識，而且也看到了很多先進(jìn)的數(shù)控機(jī)床和一些先進(jìn)的測量儀器，豐富了我們的見識，開闊了我們的視野，讓我將之前所學(xué)的數(shù)控知識更好地理解，許多以前學(xué)習(xí)中出現(xiàn)的疑惑都迎刃而解，對于此次實(shí)習(xí)看到的不懂的東西，我也通過查找各種圖書資料以及到網(wǎng)上查找相關(guān)資料來了解，這樣使我的知識得以豐富和完善。更看到了數(shù)控行業(yè)在國家發(fā)展中的重要作用，這更堅(jiān)定了我學(xué)習(xí)數(shù)控研究數(shù)控的決心。
此次實(shí)習(xí)，雖然時(shí)間不長，但是我卻收獲良多，在這里看到了先進(jìn)的各式各樣的數(shù)控加工設(shè)備，增加了我對數(shù)控領(lǐng)域知識的理解，拓寬了我的視野。同時(shí)通過這次實(shí)習(xí)，我認(rèn)識到了實(shí)踐的重要性。實(shí)踐中蘊(yùn)含了無窮無盡的知識，這些知識需要我們在實(shí)踐中取發(fā)現(xiàn)、去總結(jié)。這些在學(xué)校無法學(xué)到的知識以及寶貴的人生經(jīng)歷將激勵(lì)我在以后的人生路上勇于實(shí)踐，開拓創(chuàng)新。同時(shí)，我們應(yīng)好好珍惜每一個(gè)學(xué)習(xí)的機(jī)會，讓自己變的充實(shí)而有內(nèi)涵。
總而言之，此次天津之行，在王老師的指導(dǎo)下，受益匪淺，為我人生的下一次輝煌奠定堅(jiān)實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)，成為我受益終生的寶貴財(cái)富。
Science China Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010 Review Mechanical Engineering SPECIAL TOPIC: Huazhong University of Science and Technology October 2010 Vol.55 No.30: 34083418 doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3247-7 Tool path generation and simulation of dynamic cutting process for five-axis NC machining DING Han 1* , BI QingZhen 2 , ZHU LiMin 2 2 State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China Received October 9, 2009; accepted December 29, 2009 Five-axis NC machining provides a valid and efficient way to manufacture the mechanical parts with complex shapes, which are widely used in aerospace, energy and national defense industries. Its technology innovations have attracted much attention in re- cent years. In this paper, the state-of-the-art techniques for five-axis machining process planning are summarized and the chal- lenging problems are analyzed from the perspectives of tool path generation, integrated geometric/mechanistic simulation and machining stability analysis. The recent progresses in accessibility-based tool orientation optimization, cutter location (CL) plan- ning for line contact and three-order point contact machining, shape control of cutter envelope surface and milling stability pre- diction are introduced in detail. Finally, the emerging trends and future challenges are briefly discussed. five-axis machining, tool path generation, integrated geometric/mechanistic simulation, dynamics simulation Citation: Ding H, Bi Q Z, Zhu L M, et al. Tool path generation and simulation of dynamic cutting process for five-axis NC machining. Chinese Sci Bull, 2010, 55: 34083418, doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3247-7 In conventional three-axis NC machining only the transla- tion motions of the cutter are permitted while the cutter ori- entation is allowed to change in a five-axis machine tool because of the two additional rotational axes. The advan- tages of five-axis NC machining mainly depend on the con- trol of tool orientations: (1) The collision between the part and the cutter can be avoided by selecting the accessible tool orientation, which provides the ability to machine the complicated shapes such as aerospace impeller, turbo blade and marine propeller. (2) A large machining strip width can be obtained if the tool orientation is properly planed so that the tool tip geometry matches the part geometry well. Also, the highly efficient flank milling can be applied to machine aerospace impeller by using a five-axis machine tool. (3) The cutting conditions can be improved in five-axis ma- chining. For example, it is possible to shorten the tool overhang length if the tool orientation is optimized. Deter- mining the safe and shortest tool length is very helpful when *Corresponding author (email: ) the surface is machined in a confined space, in which only the small-diameter cutters can be used. The cutting area of a cutter, which affects the cutting force, cutter wear and ma- chined surface quality can also be controlled by changing the cutter orientation. Besides the above advantages, there exist several chal- lenging problems in five-axis machining. Since the tool orientation is adjustable, it is hard to image the complicated spatial motion of the tool. Thus, it is much more difficult to generate the collision-free and high efficient tool paths, which limits its wide application. Furthermore, the cutting force prediction and dynamics simulation are more complex because the involved cutting parameters are time-varying during the machining process. Current works about five- axis machining fall into three categories 1: tool path gen- eration, integrated geometric/mechanistic simulation and dynamics simulation, as shown in Figure 1. Tool path gen- eration is the process to plan the cutter trajectory relative to the part based on the part model, machining method and tolerance requirement. The cutter trajectory affects greatly DING Han, et al. Chinese Sci Bull October (2010) Vol.55 No.30 3409 the cutting efficiency and quality. It is also the foundation of integrated geometric/mechanistic simulation, which de- pends on the cutting geometry and cutting force modeling techniques. The cutting geometry reflects the meshing state between the cutter and the workpiece during the material removing process. By integrating the cutting geometry and cutting force models, the transient cutting force can be pre- dicted. The cutting force then can be applied to dynamics simulation, feedrate scheduling, and prediction and com- pensation of deformation. The goal of dynamics simulation is to predict the cutting stability and the machined surface profile based on the cutting force and the dynamics charac- teristics of the machine tool-cutter-fixture system. Dynam- ics simulation is helpful to optimize the cutting parameters and the tool path. The literatures on five-axis NC machining are enormous. A lot of related commercial systems have been developed, such as the general-purpose CAM softwares UG and CATIA, the special CAM software Max-AB for machining impeller and Turbosoft for machining blade, and the dy- namics simulation software CutterPro. European Commis- sion supported a project about flank milling optimization that is called “Flamingo”. Because of the obvious advan- tages of flank milling in cutting efficiency and surface qual- ity, a number of famous companies (SNECMA, Rolls Royce, Dassault Systmes) and a university (Hannover) participated in this project. The researches on five-axis high-efficiency and high-precision machining have also been carried out in some famous companies, such as United Technologies, Pratt it is difficult to automatically generate the opti- mum tool orientations that consider simultaneously all the Figure 1 Three challenging problems in five-axis NC machining. objectives required by the practical cutting process, such as collision avoidance, large effective cutting width, globally cutter orientation smoothness and shorter tool length. Also, most of the existing works about dynamics simulation aim to three-axis machining. Models and algorithms applicable to five-axis machining need to be explored. 1 Tool path generation Tool path generation is the most important technology in NC programming. The critical problem in five-axis ma- chining is to plan cutter orientations. Theoretically, the tool orientation can be any point on the Gauss Sphere. In fact, the feasible tool orientations are only a limited area on the Gauss Sphere because of the constraints of global collision avoidance and machine joint angle limits. To improve ma- chining efficiency and quality, the tool orientation of each cutter location (CL) data should be optimized by consider- ing the important factors related to a practical cutting proc- ess. The factors consist of geometrical constraints, kine- matic constraints, dynamic characteristics and physical fac- tors. How to take into account these factors is the most challenging issue in the research of tool path generation. 1.1 Collision avoidance Collision avoidance must be first considered in the process of tool path generation. There are mainly two kinds of ideas to avoid interference: (1) First generating and then adjusting cutter orientation to avoid collision. (2) Access-based tool path generation. With the former idea, cutter orientations are first planned according to some strategies. A collision detection method is then used to detect the collision be- tween the tool and the parts. If collision occurs, the tool orientations must be changed as shown in Figure 2. With the latter idea, the cutter orientations are generated directly in the accessibility cones as shown in Figure 3. The research about the first idea focuses on the algo- rithms to improve the collision detection efficiency and ad- just cutter orientations to avoid collision. In practical appli- cations, tool paths are usually composed of thousands to hundred thousands of tool positions. The collision detection often requires large computation time and resource. There- fore lots of algorithms have been proposed to improve the computation efficiency of collision detection 2,3. When machining a complex shape, the detection and adjustment processes usually repeat several times. Collision avoidance is of first concern. It is difficult to consider other factors affect- ing the cutting process when adjusting cutter orientations. The access-based tool path generation method consists of two steps. Collision-free cutter orientations at every cutter contact (CC) point are first computed. The set of colli- sion-free cutter orientations is called accessibility cone. The cutter orientations are then generated in the accessibility 3410 DING Han, et al. Chinese Sci Bull October (2010) Vol.55 No.30 Figure 2 Detecting and adjusting cutter orientation to avoid collision 2. (a) Collision detection; (b) adjust cutter orientation. Figure 3 Access-based collision-free tool path generation. (a) Accessi- bility cone; (b) collision-free tool path. cones. The most obvious merit of this method is that the iterative process of adjusting cutter orientations can almost be avoided. Based on the accessibility cone, the manufac- turability can be directly determined. Furthermore, the cut- ter orientation optimization can be carried out in the colli- sion-free space. Other objectives such as cutting forces and velocity smoothness may also be considered. The problem with this idea is the difficulty in efficiently computing ac- cessibility cones. Usually computing accessibilities will cost large computation time because complex shape may consist of hundreds of thousands of polygonal meshes. Some algo- rithms were proposed to improve computation efficiency such as the C-space (Configuration Space) methods 4,5 and visibility-based methods 610. Though C-space is an elegant concept to deal with collision avoidance, the free C-space cannot be explicitly and efficiently computed. Wang et al. 5 showed that the elapsed time to compute an accessibility cone for a part composed of only 10000 trian- gles would be 1190.33 min. Furthermore, the algorithm did not consider the collision of the tool holder. A cutter can be abstracted as a light ray that emits from the CL point if its radius is ignored. Then the problem of collision avoidance is transformed into that of visibility. We 68 described cutters visibility cone using the concept of C-space and proposed three strategies to accelerate the computation speed using the hidden-surface removal techniques in com- puter graphics. The manufacturability of a complex surface was also analyzed based on the visibility cone. However, the conventional visibility is only the necessary condition of accessibility because a milling tool usually consists of sev- eral cylindrical shapes with finite radii. The real accessible directions cannot be directly obtained from the visibility cone, and secondary collision checking and avoidance strat- egies are still needed 9. The accessibility will be equal to the visibility if both the machined surface and the interfer- ence checking surface are replaced by their offset surfaces 10. However, the offset surface is usually not easy to ob- tain and the collision avoidance of the tool holder cannot be guaranteed. Furthermore, the method only applies to ball- end cutters and cannot be extended to other types of cutters. We 11,12 proposed a high-efficient algorithm to compute the accessibility cone using graphics hardware. The algo- rithm has almost linear time complexity and applies to both flat-end and torus-end cutters. Generally, the CL point can be specified by the CC point, outward normal direction of the machined surface and cutter orientation. If the viewing direction is opposite to the cutter orientation, the global ac- cessibility of the cutter is then equal to the complete visi- bilities of the involved cylinders and cones. This equiva- lence provides an efficient method for detecting the acces- sibility of the milling cutter by using the occlusion query function of the graphics hardware. The computation effi- ciencies of the three algorithms are compared in Table 1. It is found that the computation time of our algorithm is less than 2% of that in 9 even though both the number of tri- angles and the number of cutter orientations are greater than 10 times of those in 9. The average computation time for one cutter orientation at one contact point is less than 2 of that in 9. The average computation time is also much less than that in 3 even though the number of inputted triangles is much greater than that in 3. 1.2 Cutting efficiency Nowadays, ball-end cutters are widely employed for five-axis NC machining. The major advantages of ball-end milling are that it applies to almost any surface and it is Table 1 The comparison of computation time Inputted models Method Computation platform Triangle Cutter center point Cutter orientations Computation time Average computa- tion time Ref. 9 SGI work station, Dual CPU 250M 10665 1500 80 51.63 m 2.5810 2 s Ref. 3 CPU 2.4G, RAM 512M 12600 50000 1 61.61s 1.2310 3 s Our method 12 CPU 2.4G, RAM 512M 139754 2000 1026 60.53 s 2.9510 5 s DING Han, et al. Chinese Sci Bull October (2010) Vol.55 No.30 3411 relatively easy to generate the tool path. From the manufac- turers point of view, however, the main disadvantage of ball-end milling is that it is very time consuming. It may require more finish passes and each pass removes only a small amount of material. Compared with ball-end cutter, non-ball-end cutter possesses more complex geometry, and exhibits different “effective cutting profiles” at different locations. Thus, it is possible to position the cutter so that its “effective cutting profile” well matches the design surface, which results in a great improvement of the machining strip width. Hence, increasing attention has been drawn onto the problem of tool path optimization for milling complex sur- faces with non-ball-end cutters. In five-axis machining, the machined surface is formed by the swept envelope of the cutter surface. The true ma- chining errors are the deviations between the design surface and the cutter envelope surface. It is well known that the shape of the cutter envelope surface cannot be completely determined unless all the cutter positions are given 13,14. Due to the difficulty and complexity in locally modeling the cutter envelope surface, most works adopted the approxi- mate or simplified models, which formulate the problem of optimal cutter positioning as that of approximating the cut- ter surface to the design surface in the neighborhood of the current CC point 15. These optimization models do not characterize the real machining process. Also, they only apply to certain surfaces or cutters. Only a few works have addressed the cutter positioning problem from the perspective of local approximation of cutter envelope surface to design surface 1517. For a flat-end or disk cutter, Wang et al. 15 and Rao et al. 16 developed the third- and second-order approximate models of the cutter envelope surface, respectively. However, for such a cutter, its envelope surface is swept by the cutting circle, which is not a rotary surface. Therefore, the two me- thods cannot be applied to other types of rotary cutters. Re- cently, Gong et al. 17 developed a mathematical model that describes the second-order approximation of the enve- lope surface of a general rotary cutter in the neighborhood of the CC point, and then proposed a cutter positioning strategy that makes the cutter envelope surface have a con- tact of second-order with the design surface at the CC point. However, theoretically speaking, a third-order contact be- tween the cutter envelope surface and the design surface could be achieved by adjusting the cutter orientation. This means that the cutter location planning based on the sec- ond-order model does not take full advantage of the effi- ciency and power that the five-axis machining offers. The above models are not compatible with each other. Also, the optimal CL is determined by solving two equations derived from the second- and third-order contact conditions. Due to the constraints of machine joint angle limits, global colli- sion avoidance and tool path smoothness, maybe there is no feasible solution to this system of equations. In our recent works 18,19, the geometric properties of a pair of line contact surfaces were investigated. Then, based on the observation that the cutter envelope surface contacts with the cutter surface and the design surface along the characteristic curve and cutter contact (CC) path, respec- tively, a mathematical model describing the third-order ap- proximation of the cutter envelope surface according to just one given cutter location (CL) was developed. It was shown that at the CC point both the normal curvature of the normal section of the cutter envelope surface and its derivative with respect to the arc length of the normal section could be de- termined by those of the cutter surface and the design sur- face. This model characterizes the intrinsic relationship among the cutter surface, the cutter envelope surface and the design surface in the vicinity of the CC point. On this basis, a tool positioning strategy was proposed for effi- ciently machining free-form surfaces with non-ball-end cutters. The optimal CL was obtained by adjusting the in- clination and tilt angles of the cutter until its envelope sur- face and the design surface had the third-order contact at the CC point, which resulted in a wide machining strip. The strategy can handle the constraints of joint angle limits, global collision avoidance and tool path smoothness in a nature way, and applies to general rotary cutters and com- plex surfaces. Numerical examples demonstrated that the third-order point contact approach could improve the ma- chining strip width greatly as compared with the recently reported second-order one. A comparison of the machining strip widths using different CLs for the five-axis machining of a helical surface with a toroidal cutter is summarized in Table 2. The values of the tool parameters chosen for simu- lation are: radius of the torus R=10 mm, and radius of the corner r=2.5 mm. Compared with the point milling, the flank milling can increase the material removal rate, lower the cutting forces, eliminate necessary hand finish and ensure improved com- ponent accuracy. It offers a better choice for machining slender surfaces. Lartigue et al. 20 proposed an approach to globally optimize the tool path for flank milling. The basic idea is to deform the tool axis trajectory surface so that the tool envelope surface fits the design surface ac- cording to the least-squares criterion. To simplify the com- putation, an approximate distance measure was employed. For a cylindrical cutter, Gong et al. 21 presented the error propagation principle, and transformed the problem into that of least-squares (LS) approximation of the axis trajectory surface to the offset surface of the design surface. In these two works, not the local geometric error, but the geometric Table 2 Comparison of the machining strip widths for different CLs Tolerance (mm) Ball-end cutter (R = 5.5 mm) Toroidal cutter (Second order contact) Toroidal cutter (Third order contact) = 0.005 0.69 2.48 5.28 = 0.01 0.98 3.12 6.14 3412 DING Han, et al. Chinese Sci Bull October (2010) Vol.55 No.30 error between the envelope surface of the cutter and the design surface, was of the first concern. Thus it was called the global optimization method. Although the LS method was easy for implementation and efficient in computation, it could not incorporate readily the non-over- cut constraint required by semi-finish milling, and more importantly, it did not conform to the minimum zone crite- rion recommended by ANSI and ISO standards for toler- ance evaluation. Fur- thermore, the geometric deviation of the