全自動洗衣機(jī)減速離合器設(shè)計(jì)【8張CAD圖紙】

喜歡這套資料就充值下載吧。資源目錄里展示的都可在線預(yù)覽哦。下載后都有，請放心下載，文件全都包含在內(nèi)，【有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605 或 1304139763】=喜歡這套資料就充值下載吧。資源目錄里展示的都可在線預(yù)覽哦。下載后都有，請放心下載，文件全都包含在內(nèi)，【有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605 或 1304139763】= 浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)之江學(xué)院畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）任務(wù)書學(xué)生姓名葉連強(qiáng)學(xué)號200720070325專業(yè)班級機(jī)電一體化703題目全自動洗衣機(jī)減速離合器設(shè)計(jì)指導(dǎo)教師劉福慶職 稱講師課題類型設(shè)計(jì) 論文課題來源教師科研課題 教師生產(chǎn)實(shí)際課題 學(xué)生自立課題畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）起止時間2010年 11 月 1日至 2011年 6 月15日一、畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）的主要內(nèi)容及要求1、開題報告和文獻(xiàn)閱讀（1）文獻(xiàn)閱讀：查閱文獻(xiàn)應(yīng)不少于15篇，其中外文文獻(xiàn)不少于2篇，近5年內(nèi)的文獻(xiàn)數(shù)一般不少于文獻(xiàn)總數(shù)的1/3，并應(yīng)有近2年內(nèi)的文獻(xiàn)。（2）文獻(xiàn)綜述：3000字以上，包括國內(nèi)外現(xiàn)狀、研究方向、進(jìn)展情況、存在問題、參考依據(jù)等。（3）開題報告：2000字以上，包括選題的意義、可行性分析、研究的內(nèi)容、研究方法、擬解決的關(guān)鍵問題、預(yù)期結(jié)果、研究進(jìn)度計(jì)劃等。（4）外文翻譯：3000字以上（翻譯成中文后的漢字字?jǐn)?shù)）。2、課題要解決的主要問題和具體要求1）解決減速離合器整體結(jié)構(gòu)簡化的問題；2）解決各個部件選用、布局問題。3、論文：10000字以上（部分特殊專業(yè)根據(jù)實(shí)際情況，經(jīng)教務(wù)辦確認(rèn)，可適當(dāng)調(diào)整有關(guān)字?jǐn)?shù)方面的要求），包括緒論、正文、結(jié)論、參考文獻(xiàn)等。二、主要參考文獻(xiàn)1.王三武，張銀銀，王曉軍多軸擺動減速器的設(shè)計(jì)J機(jī)械，2009(8)：52-542.高晨丹基于對星輪減速器的研究談發(fā)展前景J民營科技，2009 (9)：163.黃清世，周傳喜對少齒差行星減速器結(jié)構(gòu)的改進(jìn)J長江大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版)理工卷，2009 (1)：86-874.鐔丹中全自動洗衣機(jī)的減振降噪技術(shù)J降噪專輯，2000(28)：38-405.Firoz Ali JafriAmit ShuklaDavid F. ThompsonA numerical bifurcation study of friction effects in a slip-controlled torque on-verter clutch. Nonlinear Dynamics，2007 (3)：627-638指導(dǎo)教師簽名：年 月 日專業(yè)教研室意見：同意下達(dá)任務(wù)書 不同意下達(dá)任務(wù)書 教研室主任簽章： 年 月 日注：任務(wù)書由指導(dǎo)教師填寫，專業(yè)教研室主任審核，要求在畢業(yè)設(shè)計(jì)（論文）工作開始前下達(dá)。12th IFToMM World Congress, Besanon (France), June18-21, 2007 Revealing of Independent Oscillations in Planetary Reducer Gear owing to its symmetry L.Banakh* Yu. Fedoseev+ Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Abstract - The planetary reducer11 gear is a symmetric system. For its oscillation analysis there is applied the symmetry group representation theory, which was generalized for mechanical systems. It was found that due to reducer symmetry the oscillations decomposition has arisen. There are independent oscillations classes, such as: angular oscillations of solar gear and epicycle - satellites oscillations in phase; transversal oscillations of solar gear and epicycle - satellites oscillations in anti phase. Solar gear and epicycle oscillations in a phase do not depend on angular satellites oscillations. Keywords: planetary reducer, symmetry, group representation theory, independent oscillations I. Introduction It is well known that at the operation of planetary reducer there are oscillations of its elements, such as solar gear, epicycle and satellites. This factor essentially worsens a quality of reducer operation, and in some cases can result in their curvature and breakage. A plenty of papers are devoted to the dynamic analysis of gear reducers 1. Basically there are computational researches. In the given paper the analytical approaches for investigation of reducer dynamics is presented. The planetary reducer has a high degree of symmetry. So this property was used and the group representation theory was applied. Application of this theory allows carrying out deep enough dynamic analysis, using symmetry properties only. For this purpose it is necessary to have the dynamical model which is taking into account stiffness characteristics in linkages between reducer elements. The mathematical apparatus of the symmetry groups representation theory is widely used in the quantum mechanics, crystallographic, spectroscopy 2, 3, 4. The advantages of this approach are difficult for overestimating. With its help it is possible to define with exhaustive completeness the dynamic properties, using structure symmetry of system only without solving of motion equations. However in the classical mechanics this approach is not widely used. It is result from some particular features of mechanical systems. First, there is an * E-mail: banlinbox.ru availability of solids with 6-th degrees of freedom. It is unclear to what symmetry group to relate a solid in order that system symmetry may be retained. Second at real designs may be technological errors and mistakes at assembly, so there is a small asymmetry and the system becomes quasi symmetric Further the mechanical systems consist from various subsystems with various symmetry groups. In this connection it is necessary to have methods for the analysis as symmetric and quasi symmetric mechanical systems consisting of various subsystems and solids. Having made some generalizations, this mathematical apparatus for mechanical systems may be used. For this purpose we propose to apply the generalized projective operators 5. These operators are matrixes of the appropriate order instead of scalar as in physics. The use of generalized projective operators allows taking into account all above mentioned features of mechanical systems. The application of these operators to initial stiffness matrix leads to its decomposition on independent blocks each of them corresponds to own oscillation class in independent subspaces. To account for the solids symmetry the equivalent points were entered: these points are chosen on solid so that their displacements were compatible to connections and corresponded to group of symmetry of all system. These operators enable also may be applied with the finite elements models (FEM). II. Dynamic model of planetary reducer. Stiffness matrix. The model of a planetary reducer step is submitted on fig. 1 6. The step consists from solar gear S, its mass and radius are equal to 1 1,m r . It engages into mesh with three satellites Sti (i=1,2,3) (its masses and radius are identical and equal to 2 2,m r ). Satellites in turn are engaged into mesh with epicycle Ep ( 3 3,m r ) and they are fasten on carrier by elastic support with rigidity h6. The rigidity of gearing solar gear-satellites is equal to 1h , the gearing epicycle-satellites is 3h , is angle of gearing. 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besanon (France), June18-21, 2007 Fig.1 Planetary reducer step. S- solar gear, - epicycle, 1,2,3 satellites (St). Lets consider all over again the plane oscillations of planetary reducer step: transversal (x, y) and angular ( ) oscillations (without the casing). A stiffness matrix may be represented in a block view K = 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 S SSt SSt SSt St St St St St St K K K K K K K K K K K (1) Here on the main diagonal there are the stiffness submatrixes (3x3) for appropriate elements, and outside of the main diagonal there are stiffness submatrixes of connection between these elements. There are 15 generalized coordinates: X=( * * * * * *, , ; , , ,S S S Ep Ep Epx y x y ; 1 1 1 3 , , .St St St Stx y ) The concrete view of these blocks is submitted in Appendix. Thus, the total order of matrix K is (15x15). An inertia matrix M is diagonal. III. Introduction of equivalent points in dynamic model. Operators of symmetry. By virtue of symmetry of satellites fastening this subsystem has symmetry such as 3C (as triangle). To reveal symmetry 3C at moving of solar gear S and epicycle Ep we shall enter the coordinates 1 2 3, ,l l l on solar gear S in points of satellites fastening (fig. 2.). Fig.2 Equivalent points on solar gear S. 1,2,3,- satellites They are “equivalent points”. Their coordinates are: 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 3 1 2 ( 1)cos 3; 2 ( 1)sin 3 1, 2,3. S S i S S iS S ir X r i r i pi pi = = = = (2) or in matrix form L=AX And analogues relations for“ equivalent points” on epicycle, but instead 1r in (2) must be written 3r . And later on these coordinate of solar gear and epicycle will be used instead (x, y) and ( ). After that it is possible to count, that all coordinates of system should vary according to symmetry group 3C and, hence, it is possible to apply the projective operator of symmetry to all system elements: S, Ep, and also to three satellites St i (i =1, 2, 3).(fig.3) The ortho-normal projective operator g of symmetry for point group 3C is known as 2 . It is g = 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 6 6 6 1 10 2 2 (3) For the whole system the projective operator must be represented as block-diagonal matrix 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besanon (France), June18-21, 2007 G= St g g g (4) Here each sub matrix corresponds to S, Ep, and also to three satellites St i (i=1, 2, 3). So Because we have three identical satellites and each of them has 3 degrees of freedom ( , i iSt St x y and angular . i iSt St ), therefore it is necessary to enter generalize operator (3) 3,4 and to consider Stg as block matrix where the each element is diagonal matrix (33), that is it is possible to present each element as Stg = 1 , 1 1 = E g E E E Thus to initial coordinates ,( , , )S Epx y of solar gear and epicycle consistently two transformations are applied: A and G . And resulting transformation of an initial matrix K equals to product of operators G A. This orthogonal transformation and it looks like G= St gA gA g , where gA= 2 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 + By applying of this transformation to matrix (1), we shall receive *= (G)()(G)tr So the corresponding transformations of coordinates and forces are X*=(G), F*=(G)trF (5) As a result the initial matrix K (1515) is divided on 3 independent blocks (5x5) and, looking like, * * *(1) *(2) = I II II K K K K (6) The inertia matrix M remains diagonal because matrix G A is orthogonal; therefore the independence of oscillation classes defines matrix * only. IV. Revealing of independent motions classes at for natural and forced oscillations A. Natural oscillations From the view of matrix (6) it is seen, that owing to system symmetry there is a decomposition of initial matrix K, and, hence, division of oscillation classes and as well as space of parameters. The concrete relations for submatrixes in (6) show that there are following independent oscillations classes: I-st class (subspace I- submatrix *IK ): angular oscillation of solar gear and epicycle + oscillations of satellites in a phase. Dimension of this subspace is equal to 5. Its determining parameters are: 1 2 3 1 3 6 12 13 9, , , , , , , , .r r r h h h h r h 2-nd class (subspace II- submatrixes *(1)IIK (2)*IIK ): transversal oscillations of solar gear and epicycle + oscillations of satellites in an anti phase. Subspace II breaks up to two identical submatrixes *(1)IIK and (2)*IIK (55). It means that in system there are 5 equal frequencies. Its determining parameters are: 2 1 3 6 7 9, , , , , , .r h h h h h Thus, taking into account only properties of symmetry it is possible to receive deep enough analysis of dynamic properties of system of a planetary reducer. Besides it is possible to simplify also process of system optimization. B. Forced oscillations At the forced oscillations the use of the independent oscillation classes is suitable only in two cases: a) if the points of application of the external forces have the same type of symmetry, as a design has, or b) if they are disposed according to the independent classes of oscillations. Really, then transformation (5) bring a forces vector F* into a form containing zero elements or in 1-st, or 2-th subspaces. The analysis of the real loadings forces on a reducer, shows, that it is valid if elements disbalances are the same: ) identical satellites disbalances + disbalance of epicycle; ) identical satellites disbalances + disbalance of solar gear. V. The further motions decomposition. The further decomposition of subspaces I and II in (6) is possible only if there are additional conditions raising a type of system symmetry. 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besanon (France), June18-21, 2007 These conditions, in particular, can be received from similarity symmetry of solar gear and epicycle. They look like: 1. Equality of gearing stiffness with S and Ep, i.e. 1 2h h= , 2. Equality of partial frequencies for angular motions S and Ep ( ) ( ) S Ep = , whence: 7 8h h= , or 3. Equality of partial frequencies at tranversal motions of S and Ep ( , ) ( , )S Epx y x y = , whence: h7=2h9. So by fulfillment of conditions 1,2 (or 1,3) the additional symmetry type 2C is appeared (reflection symmetry). To this symmetry group the operator 2G (or 2G ) is corresponded 2G = 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 ; 1 3 1 1 r h r h 2G = 1 1 1 1 13 2 1 3 1 1 2 h h The application of these operators to matrix K* permit to achieve the further decomposition of corresponding matrixes and appropriate motions. Really they may have symmetric and anti symmetric oscillation classes for solar gear and epicycle. Thus the coordinate transformation is: 1 1 1 * * 3 1 31 1 1 1 * * 3 1 31 S Epr rh S Epr rh = + = X X X X X X And 1 * * 3 12 1 * * 3 12 S Ep h S Ep h = + = X X X X X X By this coordinate transformation the following independent motion types are arisen ( )* *( ) II I KK K The concrete relations for these submatrixes show that there are following independent oscillations classes: I subspace (matrix *IK ): -angular oscillations of solar gear S and epicycle Ep in phase + satellites Sti oscillation along axis *x in phase), II subspace(matrix *IK ): -angular oscillations of solar gear S and epicycle Ep in anti phase + satellites St i oscillation along axis *y and around axis in phase. Similarly occurs decomposition of subspaces II and matrixes *(1)IIK , (2)*IIK but instead of angular oscillations S and Ep there are their transversal oscillation along an axis x * (or y *), and oscillation of satellites in an anti phase. As shows the analysis of matrix *IK the oscillations of S and Ep in a phase do not depend on angular oscillation of satellites ( St ). From analysis of *IK and *IIK we notice, that at h7=h8=h6 =0 a zero root may be arisen. This oscillation type means the free oscillations of satellites (navigation) at angular (or translation) oscillations solar gear and epicycle. A. Forced oscillations. The choice of exited forces according one of these oscillation types do not induce the other oscillation types because they are orthogonal each other. The exciting forces acting in subspace II provide an independence of symmetric and anti symmetric oscillations S and Ep if they are applied simultaneously to S and Ep and are equal on value. Then transformation of external forces F * looks like, submitted in table. 12th IFToMM World Congress, Besanon (France), June18-21, 2007 Table. The distribution of external forces 2 F = g F = subspace IIK IIK Sx 2 1 1f h 0 Sy 3 1 1f h 0 xSt 1 12 cosf h 0 And this distribution of external forces do not induce the anti symmetric oscillations classes. VI. Conclusions There was established that in planetary reducer gear due to its symmetry the decomposition of oscillations arised. There are independent oscillations, such as: -angular oscillations of solar gear and epicycle + satellites oscillations in phase; -transversal oscillations of solar gear and epicycle + satellites oscillation in anti phase. At equality of partial frequencies of solar gear and epicycle their oscillations in a phase do not depend on angular oscillation of satellites. By a specific parameters choice the free oscillations of satellites (navigation) are independent from angular oscillations of solar gear and epicycle. The choice of exited forces according to one of these oscillation types induces the oscillation of this type only because oscillation types are orthogonal to each other. These results are correct for planetary reducer gear at any parameter change within given symmetry type. References 1 Airapetov E. Dynamics pf planetary mechanisms. M. Nauka, 1980 2 Hammermesh M. Group theory and its application to physical problem. Addison -Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1962. 3 Fulton w., Harris J. Represantation theory. A first course. Springer-Verlag, 1991. 4 G.D.James. The representation theory of the symmetric groups, Lecture Notes in Math, vol.682, Springer-Verlag- New-York-Berlin, 1978 5 Banakh L, Gadjieva E. Research of dynamics of regular and quasi regular systems with rotary symmetry. Mashinovedenie , 1984, N 3, .9-16 (in Russian) 6 Banakh L., Grinkevitch V., Ovchinnikova N.,.Fedoseev Yu. Analysis of dynamics for mechanisms with help of symmetry groups. In Mashinovedenie, 1986, N 2, P. 67-70, (in Russian) Appendix 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 , cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin cos sin i i S i i i SC i i i i i i C i i i a b a b a b h h r h h h r h r h r h r r h h h r h h h r h r h r h r r = = = = K K K K 2 2h 21 1 7 2 1 1 12 2 2 1 2 9 2 2 2 9 2 2 ( 1) 2 ( 1)cos , sin ( 1. ) 2 1, 3 3 4 4, 3 3 i i i i i n n n h h h r h b h h b h r h r pi pi = = = = + = + = + = + 1 2 3 2 1 2 6 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 6 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 ( ) ( )cos sin ( ) ( )sin ( ) sin . ( ) C C C h h Cos h h h h h r Cos h h h h h r symm h h r + + = + + + + K K K The paper is supported by the RFFI project 05-01-08062-_a.