帶側(cè)臺方套管模具設(shè)計（全套含CAD圖紙）

帶側(cè)臺方套管模具設(shè)計（全套含CAD圖紙）,帶側(cè)臺方,套管,模具設(shè)計,全套,CAD,圖紙 參加畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）答辯申請書學(xué)生姓名學(xué)院機械工程學(xué)院專業(yè)班級機械134題目帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計指導(dǎo)教師答辯前學(xué)生填寫畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）工作總結(jié)和參加答辯申請：方套管模具是注塑模具中比較典型的模具當(dāng)然也有它自身的特點。典型在于它是方柱形，內(nèi)有貫通的圓形孔，形狀比較規(guī)則，相對比較對稱；它的特點在于柱子的長度相比于截面的圓直徑比較大，所軸向長度很大，而且他的一個面上有圓柱凸臺且有通孔。所以在設(shè)計時必須考慮測抽芯，哈呋分型的設(shè)計等很多問題。在設(shè)計過程中，主要對模具的型芯、型腔、澆注系統(tǒng)、導(dǎo)向系統(tǒng)和脫模系統(tǒng)進行了精密的計算和合理的選擇。設(shè)計中主要運用了Pro/E和Auto CAD軟件，根據(jù)制件的零件圖繪制了模具的各個零件圖和裝配圖。指導(dǎo)教師對學(xué)生參加畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）答辯的意見：指導(dǎo)教師：年 月 日畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)成績考核表學(xué)生姓名專業(yè)班級機械134題 目帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計評 審 者考 核 項 目評分（每項滿分10分）指導(dǎo)教師1工作態(tài)度與遵守紀(jì)律的情況2掌握基本理論、專業(yè)知識、基本技能的程度和閱讀外文的水平3獨立工作能力、綜合運用所學(xué)知識分析和解決問題能力及實際工作能力提高的程度4完成任務(wù)的情況與水平（工作量及說明書、論文與圖紙、軟、硬件實物成果質(zhì)量和創(chuàng)新性）評閱人5說明書、論文質(zhì)量（正確性、條理性、創(chuàng)造性和實用性）及圖紙質(zhì)量（視圖完整、布局合理、圖面整潔、線條清晰、標(biāo)注規(guī)范）6技術(shù)水平（理論、分析、計算、實驗和軟、硬件實物性能以及創(chuàng)新性）答辯小組（或答辯委員會）7完成任務(wù)的情況與水平（按規(guī)范化要求）8說明書、論文、圖紙與實物成果的質(zhì)量和創(chuàng)新性9答辯時講述的條理性及系統(tǒng)性10回答問題的正確性總評成績總評成績等級（優(yōu)、良、中、及格、不及格）指導(dǎo)教師簽字：評閱人簽字：答辯小組組長（答辯委員會主任）簽字：注：此表一式兩份，一份由教研室保存，另一份裝入學(xué)生畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）檔案袋中。畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)成績考核表學(xué)生姓名專業(yè)班級機械134題 目帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計評 審 者考 核 項 目評分（每項滿分10分）指導(dǎo)教師1工作態(tài)度與遵守紀(jì)律的情況2掌握基本理論、專業(yè)知識、基本技能的程度和閱讀外文的水平3獨立工作能力、綜合運用所學(xué)知識分析和解決問題能力及實際工作能力提高的程度4完成任務(wù)的情況與水平（工作量及說明書、論文與圖紙、軟、硬件實物成果質(zhì)量和創(chuàng)新性）評閱人5說明書、論文質(zhì)量（正確性、條理性、創(chuàng)造性和實用性）及圖紙質(zhì)量（視圖完整、布局合理、圖面整潔、線條清晰、標(biāo)注規(guī)范）6技術(shù)水平（理論、分析、計算、實驗和軟、硬件實物性能以及創(chuàng)新性）答辯小組（或答辯委員會）7完成任務(wù)的情況與水平（按規(guī)范化要求）8說明書、論文、圖紙與實物成果的質(zhì)量和創(chuàng)新性9答辯時講述的條理性及系統(tǒng)性10回答問題的正確性總評成績總評成績等級（優(yōu)、良、中、及格、不及格）指導(dǎo)教師簽字：評閱人簽字：答辯小組組長（答辯委員會主任）簽字：注：此表一式兩份，一份由教研室保存，另一份裝入學(xué)生畢業(yè)設(shè)計（論文）檔案袋中。畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)答辯記錄卡學(xué)生姓名專業(yè)班級機械134題 目帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計自述情況： 回答問題情況：答辯得分12345678910總分平均得分答辯地點： 記錄人： 年 月 日畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)評閱書題 目 帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計 學(xué)生姓名 專業(yè)班級 機械134 所在學(xué)院 機械工程學(xué)院 指導(dǎo)教師 職稱 副教授 所在單位 1.指導(dǎo)教師評語：簽名：年 月 日2.評閱人評語：簽名：年 月 日3.答辯小組評語：簽名： 年 月 日畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)評閱書題 目 帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計 學(xué)生姓名 專業(yè)班級 機械134 所在學(xué)院 機械工程學(xué)院 指導(dǎo)教師 職稱 副教授 所在單位 1.指導(dǎo)教師評語：簽名：年 月 日2.評閱人評語：簽名：年 月 日3.答辯小組評語：簽名： 年 月 日畢業(yè)設(shè)計(論文)評閱書題 目 帶側(cè)臺方套管注塑模具設(shè)計 學(xué)生姓名 專業(yè)班級 機械134 所在學(xué)院 機械工程學(xué)院 指導(dǎo)教師 職稱 副教授 所在單位 1.指導(dǎo)教師評語：簽名：年 月 日2.評閱人評語：簽名：年 月 日3.答辯小組評語：簽名： 年 月 日ORIGINAL ARTICLEOptimization of injection molding process parametersusing integrated artificial neural network modeland expected improvement function methodHuizhuo Shi&Yuehua Gao&Xicheng WangReceived: 16 October 2008 /Accepted: 24 September 2009 /Published online: 20 November 2009#Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009Abstract In this study, an adaptive optimization methodbased on artificial neural network model is proposed tooptimize the injection molding process. The optimizationprocess aims at minimizing the warpage of the injectionmolding parts in which process parameters are designvariables. Moldflow Plastic Insight software is used toanalyze the warpage of the injection molding parts. Themold temperature, melt temperature, injection time, packingpressure, packing time, and cooling time are regarded asprocess parameters. A combination of artificial neuralnetwork and design of experiment (DOE) method is usedto build an approximate function relationship betweenwarpage and the process parameters, replacing the expensivesimulation analysis in the optimization iterations. Theadaptive process is implemented by expected improvementwhich is an infilling sampling criterion. Although the DOEsize is small, this criterion can balance local and global searchand tend to the global optimal solution. As examples, acellular phone cover and a scanner are investigated. Theresults show that the proposed adaptive optimization methodcan effectively reduce the warpage of the injection moldingparts.Keywords Injectionmolding.Warpage.Optimization.Design ofexperiment.Artificialneuralnetwork.Expectedimprovementfunction1 IntroductionInjection molding is the most widely used process forproducingplastic products.The entireinjectionmoldingcyclecan be divided into three stages: filling, post-filling, and moldopening 1. During production, warpage is one of the mostimportantqualityproblems,especiallyforthethin-shellplasticproducts.Severalresearcheshavebeendevotedtothewarpageoptimization of thin-shell plastic parts 29. Warpage can bereduced by modifying the geometry of parts, or changing thestructure of molds, or adjusting the process parameters.The part design and mold design are usually determined inthe initial stage of product development, which cannot beeasily changed. Therefore, optimizing process parameters isthe most feasible and reasonable method.It is an important issue in plastic injection molding topredict and optimize the warpage before manufacturingtakes place. Many literatures have been devoted to warpageoptimization. Lee and Kim 10 optimized the wallthickness and process conditions using the modifiedcomplex method to reduce warpage and obtained areduction in warpage of over 70%. Sahu et al. 11optimized process conditions to reduce warpage by acombined implementation of the modified complex methodand design of experiments. Their results showed that thesemethods can effectively reduce warpage.Although these methods can reduce warpage effectively,they are costly and time-consuming because they performlots of expensive function evaluations. Compared to thesemethods, the Taguchi method 1214 is easier to performandcananalyze the effective factors,but itcanonlyobtainthebetter combination of process parameters, not the optimalsolution in the design space.The warpage is a nonlinear and implicit function of theprocess parameters, which is typically estimated by theH. Shi:Y. Gao:X. Wang (*)State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for IndustrialEquipment, Dalian University of Technology,Dalian,116024 Liaoning, Chinae-mail: Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962DOI 10.1007/s00170-009-2346-7solution of finite element equations. In general, a complicatedtask often requires huge computational cost. Hence, in orderto reduce the computational cost in warpage optimization,many researchers have introduced some surrogate models,such as Kriging surrogate model, artificial neutral network(ANN), response surface method, and support vector regres-sion. Gao et al. 1517 optimized process conditions toreduce the warpage by combining the kriging surrogatemodel with modified rectangular grid approach or expectedimprovement (EI) function method. Kurtaran et al. combinedthe genetic algorithms with a neural network or responsesurface method to optimize the process parameters forreducing the warpage of plastic parts 18, 19. Zhou et al.20 optimized injection molding process using supportvector regression model and genetic algorithm. Their resultshave shown that the methods based on the surrogate modelcan reduce the high computational cost in the warpageoptimization, and the genetic algorithm can be used toapproach to the global optimal design effectively.In this study, the mold temperature, melt temperature,injection time, packing pressure, packing time, and coolingtime are considered as process parameters. A small-sizedesign of experiment is obtained by Latin hypercube design(LHD), and the warpage values are evaluated by MoldFlowPlastic Insight software. An adaptive optimization based onartificial neural network model is proposed. The adaptiveprocess is performed by an EI function, which canadaptively select the additional sample points to improvethe surrogate model and find the optimum value 17. Thismethod has been viewed as effective global optimization21. The numerical results show that this method canreduce warpage efficiently.2 Artificial neural networkANN is a powerful tool for the simulation and prediction ofnonlinear problems. A neural network comprises manyhighly interconnected processing units called neurons. Eachneuron sums weighted inputs and then applies a linear ornonlinear function to the resulting sum to determine theoutput, and all of them are arranged in layers and combinedthrough excessive connectivity.The typical ANN is a back propagation network (BPN)2226 which has been widely used in many researchfields. A BPN has hierarchical feed-forward networkarchitecture, and the output of each layer is sent directlyto each neuron in the layer above. Although a BPN canhave many layers, all pattern recognition and classificationtasks can be accomplished with a three-layer BPN 27. pac ktct packP Warpage1mel tTmoldT 6 int 6Fig. 1 Configuration of the ANN model Add the modified design as a new sample in set of samplesStartGenerate a set of samples Run Moldflow to generate corresponding warpage values Perform ANN simulation Optimize EI function Is the convergence criterion satisfied?Obtain optimal design End YNFig. 2 Flowchart of combining ANN/EI optimizationFig. 3 Mid-plane model of a cellular phone coverTable 1 Ranges of the process parametersParameterTmold(C)Tmelt(C)tin(s)Ppack(%)tpack(s)tc(s)Lower limit502600.26015Upper limit903000.890515956Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962A BPN is trained by repeatedly presenting a series ofinput/output pattern sets to the network. The neural networkgradually “l(fā)earns” the input/output relationship of interestby adjusting the weights between its neurons to minimizethe error between the actual and predicted output patterns ofthe training set. After training, a separate set of data whichis not in the training set is used to monitor the networksperformance. When the mean squared error (MSE) reachesa minimum, network training is considered complete andthe weights are fixed.In this paper, a three-layer ANN model with one hiddenlayer was used. The mold temperature (Tmold), melttemperature (Tmelt), injection time (tin), packing pressure(Ppack), packing time (tpack), and cooling time (tc) areregarded as input variables, and warpage is regarded asoutput variable. So the neuron numbers of the input layerand output layer of ANN are determined. The neuronnumber of the middle layer was determined by trials. Thetransfer function between the input layer and the hiddenlayer is “Logsig,” and the transfer function between thehidden layer and the output layer is “Purelin.” The trainfunction is trainlm, performance function is MSE, learningcycle is 50,000, learning rate is 0.05, and momentum factoris 0.9. The configuration of ANN used in this paper isshown in Fig. 1.3 EI methodANNs can be used as an arbitrary function approximationmechanism which “l(fā)earns” from observed data. ANN is hereused to build an approximate function relationship betweenthe warpage and the process parameters, replacing theexpensive analysis and reanalysis of simulation programs inthe optimizationprocess.Ingeneral,the approximate functionmay have many extremum points, making the optimizationalgorithms employing such functions converge to a localminimum. EI algorithm is here introduced to close to theglobal optimization solution.EI involves computing the possible improvement at agiven point. It is a heuristic algorithm for a sequential designstrategy for detecting the global minimum of a deterministicfunction 17, 21. It can balance local and global search.Beforesamplingatsomepointx, the value of Y(x) is uncertain.Y(x) at a candidate point x is normally distributed with b yx,and variance 2given using the ANN predictor. If the currentbest function value is Ymin, then an improvement I Ymin? yx by the ANN predictor can be achieved. Thelikelihood of this improvement is given by the normal density:1ffiffiffiffiffi2pps x exp ?Ymin? I ?b y x 22s2x #:1Then, the expected value of the improvement is found byintegrating over this density:EI ZI1I01ffiffiffiffiffi2pps x exp ?Ymin? I ?b y x 22s2x #()dI:2Fig. 5 Warpage of the cover after optimizationFig. 4 Warpage of the cover before optimizationTable 2 Optimization resultsParameterTmold(C)Tmelt(C)tin(s)Ppack(%)tpack(s)tc(s)Warpage(mm)Beforeoptimization75.57 288.31 0.57 63.96 1.22 5.700.1941Afteroptimization73.86 298.99 0.20 60.00 1.00 9.480.0833Fig. 6 Model of a scannerInt J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962957Using integration by parts, Eq. 2 can be written as:EI sx u6u fu?3where and f are the normal cumulative distributionfunction and density function, respectively, andu Ymin?b y x s x :4The first term of Eq. 3 is the difference between thecurrent minimum response value Yminand the predictedvalueb yx at x, penalized by the probability of improvement.Hence, the first term is large when b yx is small. The secondterm is a product of predicted error (x) and normal densityfunction f(u). The normal density function value is largewhen the error (x) is large and b yx is close to Ymin. Thus,the expected improvement will tend to be large at a pointwith the predicted value smaller than Yminand/or with muchpredicted uncertainty.This infilling sampling method has some advantages: (1)It can intelligently add sample points to improve the ANN,so it allows “l(fā)earns” from observed data with a small size;(2) it can avoid searching the areas with relative largefunction values and reduce the computational cost; (3) itcan also avoid adding some points close to each other in thedesign space and keep the stability of ANN prediction.4 Warpage optimization based on improved ANNmethod4.1 Warpage optimization problemA warpage minimum design problem can be described asfollows:Findx1;x2;?;xmmaxmizeE I x1;x2;?;xm?Subjecttox?j? xj? xjj 1;2;?;m5where the process parameters x1;x2;?;xmare the designvariables and x?jand xjare the lower and upper limits of thejth design variable. The objective function E I x1;x2;? ? ?;xm?is given by Eqs. 3 and 4 inwhich Yminand yx are the currentminimum value and the predicted value of warpage, respectively.4.2 Convergence criterionThe convergence criterion is here to satisfy:E Ix?Ymin? $r6where r is a given convergence tolerance and Yminis theminimum function value in samples. The left-hand side is aratio between the maximum expected improvement and theminimum function value. Thus, r can be given withoutconsideration of the magnitudes, and r=0.1%.4.3 Implementation of optimization procedureImplementation of integrated ANN model and EI functionmethod is given in Fig. 2.5 Warpage optimization for a cellular phone coverand a scanner5.1 The optimization problemIn this section, the results of two warpage optimizationexamples are presented. These are intended to show theTable 3 Ranges of the process parametersParameterTmold(C)Tmelt(C)tin(s)Ppack(%)tpack(s)tc(s)Lower limit802600.26015Upper limit1203000.890515Table 4 Optimization resultsParameterTmold(C)Tmelt(C)tin(s)Ppack(%)tpack(s)tc(s)Warpage (mm)Before optimization92.95298.380.2585.492.8310.300.4805After optimization119.32300.000.2090.004.9215.000.2896Fig. 7 Warpage of the scanner before optimization958Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962efficiency and accuracy of the integrated ANN model andEI function method.The first example is a cellular phone cover. It isdiscretized by 3,780 triangle elements, as shown in Fig. 3.Its length, width, height, and thickness are 130, 55, 11, and1 mm, respectively. The material is polycarbonate (PC)/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene.The mold temperature (Tmold), melt temperature (Tmelt),injection time (tin), packing pressure (Ppack), packing time(tpack), and cooling time (tc) are considered as designvariables. The objective function warpage(x) is quantifiedby the out-of-plane displacement, which is the sum of bothmaximum upward and downward deformations withreference to the default plane in Moldflow Plastics Insightsoftware. The constraints consist of the lower and upperbounds on the design variables given in Table 1. ANNmodel is here used to approximate warpage(x), i.e., b y x inEq. 2.The ranges of mold temperature and melt temperatureare based on the recommended values in Moldflow PlasticsInsight, and the ranges of injection time, packing pressure,packing time, and cooling time are determined by theexperience of the manufacturer.First, ten samples are selected by LHD, then the warpagevalue corresponding to every sample design is obtained byrunning Moldflow Plastics Insight software, and finally, anapproximate function relationship between warpage and theprocess parameters is constructed by means of ANN modelsimulation, replacing the expensive simulation analysis inthe optimization iterations.The optimization problem based on EI function is solvedhere using the sequential quadratic programming 28. Theexpected improvement surface may be highly multimodalFig. 8 Warpage of the scanner after optimization00.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.095060708090Mold temperature (oC)Warpage (mm)00.050.10.150.2260270280290300Melt temperature (oC)00.050.10.150.20.250.30.20.30.40.50.60.70.8Injection time(s)Warpage (mm)00.020.040.060.080.10.120.1460708090Packing pressure (MPa)Warpage (mm)Warpage (mm)00.020.040.060.080.10.120.141 23 45Packing time (s)Warpage (mm)0.0760.0780.080.0820.0840.0860.0880.090.0920.094579111315Cooling time (s)Warpage (mm)Fig. 9 Each factors individualeffect on the warpage of acellular phone coverInt J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962959and thus difficult to optimize reliably. Firstly, 1,000 randompoints are selected, and EI function values computation areperformed by means of the constructed approximatemathematical function. The point with maximum EIfunction value is then selected to be one initial design. Inaddition, the point with minimum warpage value in samplepoints is selected to be another initial design, i.e., twooptimization processes are executed at each iteration. Incomparison with simulation analysis, these processesconsume very short time and can be ignored.Only 20 iterations were needed to obtain the optimizationsolution; the results are given in Table 3. Figures 4 and 5show the warpage values before and after optimization,respectively (Table 2).The second example is a scanner. The cover is discretizedby 8,046 triangle elements, as shown in Fig. 6. It is made ofPC. The mold temperature (Tmold), melt temperature (Tmelt),injection time (tin), packing pressure (Ppack), packing time(tpack), and cooling time (tc) are considered as designvariables. The objective function warpage(x) is quantifiedby the out-of-plane displacement, which is the sum of bothmaximum and minimum deformations with reference tothe default plane in Moldflow Plastics Insight software. Theconstraints consist of the lower and upper bounds on thedesign variables given in Table 3.The ranges of mold temperature and melt temperatureare based on the recommended values in Moldflow PlasticsInsight, and the ranges of injection time, packing pressure,packing time, and cooling time are determined by theexperience of the manufacturer.Initial ten samples are selected by LHD; the optimalsolution was obtained after 25 iterations. The results aregiven in Table 4. Figures 7 and 8 show the warpage beforeand after optimization, respectively.6 DiscussionsTables 2 and 4 show that several process parameters arelying in the boundaries of the limits. Figures 9 and 10 showeach factors effect on the warpage when all other factorsare kept at their optimal level, respectively.Figures 9 and 10 show that high melt temperature andshort injection time are desirable. The warpage valuedecreases nonlinearly as melt temperature changesfrom260C to 300C. This is because lower melt temper-ature has bad liquidity and can lead to early formation offrozen skin layer, which can generate higher shear stressand block flow. If there is no enough time to release theshear stress, the warpage will increase. However, the00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.48090100110120Mold temperature (oC)Warpage (mm)00.10.20.30.40.50.6260270280290300Melt temperature (oC)Warpage (mm)00.050.10.150.20.250.30.350.40.450.50.20.30.40.50.60.70.8Injection time (s)Warpage (mm)00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9160708090Packing pressure (MPa)Warpage (mm)00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91 23 4 5Packing time(s)Warpage (mm)0.270.280.290.300.310.320.335 79111315Cooling time (s)Warpage (mm)Fig. 10 Each factors individualeffect on the warpage of ascanner960Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48:955962warpage value increases nonlinearly with the injection time.For the thin-wall injection molded parts, long injection timecan increase the ratio of the frozen skin layer to the moltencore layer. This can block badly the flow and lead to highershear stress and more molecular orientation in the material.The warpage value changes only a period of packing timeand almost is constant when packing time is longer thansome values. Figures 9 and 10 also show that the variationof warpage values is irregular when changing other processparameters such as packing pressure, cooling time, andmold temperature. The warpage value depends on thecombined efforts of all process parameters, and all theseprocess parameters should be provided by means ofoptimization.7 ConclusionsIn this study, an integrated ANN model and EI functionmethod is proposed to minimize the warpage of theinjection molding parts. This method aims at optimizingsome approximate functions trained by the ANN model.The optimization process can be started from anapproximate function trained by a set of a few samplepoints, then adding the best sample point into thetraining set by means of EI function. Every iteration ofthe optimization consists of training the approximatefunction and optimizing the EI function. The EI functioncan take the relatively unexpected space into consider-ation to improve the accuracy of the ANN model andquickly approach to the global optimization solution. Asthe applications, a cellular phone cover and a scanner,are investigated, only a small number of MoldflowPlastics Insight analysis are needed in optimizationsbecause the first iterations for both examples need a setof a few sample points (only ten sample points) andfollow-up of every iteration adds one sample point intothe set only. Numerical results show that the proposedoptimization method is efficient for reducing warpage ofinjection molded parts and can converge to the optimi-zation solution quickly. Although the design variables ofthese relatively examples are limited to the moldtemperature, melt temperature, injection time, packingpressure, packing time, and cooling time, the presentmethod is also applicable to more process parameters.However,